Cognitive Dissonance is a False theory termed for the given scenario. The correct term for the given scenario is Drive reduction Theory.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Cognitive dissonance refers to someone's behaviour conflicts with their beliefs or attitudes which does not matches with the given scenario.
The drive reduction theory describes people’s drive or motivation to satisfy their desires. This drive or desire create arousal and tension emanating from biological or physiological needs. It means that people often experience drive or desires that increases negative needs.
Furthermore, unsatisfied desire also creates tension or unpleasant feeling that need to be reduced. The only thing that lowers the drivers is if one satisfy their needs or desire. As in the question, when we deny our sugar craving, it simply doesn’t go away, it builds up until it is satisfied.
I believe the answer is: <span>greater appreciation of life.
Mourning is a very natural occurrence that has to be endured by all people every time we lost someone that we care about.
For most people, the lost of the loved ones would open a lot of perspective regarding life, and might create a resolution to change their life to the better.</span>
Answer:
B). Just as.
Explanation:
<u>Jerry M. Burger's replication to Stanley Milgram's one of the most acknowledged study and experiment on obedience propose that in comparison to people in 1970s, after fifty years of huge span of time people in 2006 were 'just as' likely to adhere to the authority' and ready to do anything asked for by the authority as they were previously.</u> His claims replicate Milgram's theory by saying that the factors explained by him are still operative. He even duplicated his proposition regarding the distinct rates of obedience among men and women. Therefore, <u>option B</u> becomes the correct answer to this question.
In the paper, Madison deals with the corruption of the government. This is the main "evil" tackled in the paper.
Madison believed that the minority right would be insecure if the majority unites to achieve a common interest. This means that the minority rights are threatened by the majority rule.
