Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
Remixing technologies is how our kids speak.” Do you agree with this statement? ... A:Yes because kids are getting more and more into technology at a very young age and need to know what it's like without an ipphone or laptop like the rest of us.
Answer: ASAP
Explanation:
Either at the scene or at the hospital
Answer:
1.make an arrest 2. conduct a search 3.Receive a warrant
Explanation:
The Constitution states that an officer must need probable cause to arrest,search and receive a warrant. An example may be if an officer were to pull over someone. If the officer smells the stench of marijuana then that officer has probable cause to search that vehicle. But if the officer pulled that person over and just randomly searched their vehicle that wouldn't be probable cause and therefore that officer is committing an unconstitutional act and will be punished with relief of duty.
