Answer:
interaction
Explanation:
without interaction there is no
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
1. I would maybe match the two samples by the tone of their writing? I know it doesn’t make sense but maybe look for clues of their vocabulary or how they describe things. I will also check for the size of the two writings or see any similar details.
