Good example of appeasement being used is the Munich Conference (1938), and the Potsdam Conference (1945). Many see appeasement as surrendering to another country’s wishes, which can make a nation and its leader look weak. It’s a temporary measure taken to stop a war, but many times is unsuccessful in the long run. Leaders such as Neville Chamberlain and FDR used this strategy with Hitler and Stalin, who both took advantage of what they had been given. Appeasement can put a country in a weak position due to them losing territory, resources, etc. It’s a very diplomatic policy, but usually only curbs a threat for a short time. Hope this helped a little! :)
The federal government was too weak no enforce their laws and couldnt levy taxes, and only could request taxes in the aricles, which was a main reason of its failure. There was no national courts set up in the articles or national currency. Im not sure exactly what the question is asking but im assuming its talking about how powers differed between the constitution and the articles and in conclusion I would say, after independance America was a baby country who was scared of the rights being incriminated once again so the central government had very little powers.
<span>According to Martin Gilbert, one effect of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s policies on industry was that production of many goods such as steel went up a lot. </span>
Answer:
Verbonia should reflect perfection and the primacy of Roman engineering.
Explanation:
Built under the supervision of Marcus Fabricus, Vebonia should be a well-designed city, with connections with Rome, and where Caesar and his armies could stay during their campaigns in Gaul. With high walls and wide streets, access to Verbonia was trough a complex and strong bridge built using the recent technology to drain the water.
