The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The main differences between the editorialist from the Chicago Times and President Lincoln on the purpose of the Civil War were the following.
The United States President Abraham Lincoln referred to the purpose of the Civil War in his famous Gettysburg speech, delivered on November 19, 1863.
He was in a ceremony in the National Cemetery located in Pennsylvania when he paid tribute to the American soldiers that had died in the war. And exhorted the people to follow the principles of liberty and justice that characterized the United States.
On the other hand, the editorial published in the Chicago Times criticized Lincoln and his message. The editorial published was: <em>"The cheeks of American people must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat, and dishwatery utterances."</em>
The editorialists expressed that Lincoln's message was not a good one and out of context.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Option(D).
Promoting ping-pong diplomacy in China was an element of the shift toward détente in foreign policy of American in the Cold War period
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Détente is referred to the period when the tension between US and the Soviet Union was gradually loosening through communication and signing of salt treaties. during the period of cold war,It was a feature of the US foreign policy.
Ping pong diplomacy was the exchange of tennis player between United States and People Republic of China as an attempt to make the relations between both the countries cordial again.
Answer:
Observation
Explanation:
According to the quote, "It is the duty of an astronomer to compose the history of the celestial motions through careful and skillful observation"
An astronomer must first observe before he can do any other thing.
Answer:
World war 2 era marked the end of colonialism. If you look at what happened after ww2 you'll see that both in Africa and in Asia, new countries were born from French and British colonies.
This is a direct consequence of the USA being the western superpower, she obliged her former allies to free their colonies. On one hand that has to do with their history, that is to say, a republic born after fighting a king. But it also has an economic explanation; independent countries will probably buy more American goods than colonies.
That worked fine in some countries (Egipt, Irán, India) but did not work at all in others: Vietnam, Iraq, Siria, Uganda, etc.
Finally, all this happened because European colonialist countries did not have any power to achieve any different deal with the USA.
Athens, Sparta being war based has little slave.
