You can arrest someone with a bench warrant.
Answer:
Don executes a will leaving half of his farm to his spouse Elsie and the rest to his sons, Frank and Greg, in equal shares. The will disinherits a third son, Hal. Don and Elsie divorce, but Don dies before changing his will. Under the Uniform Probate Code:
c. Frank and Greg receive the entire estate in equal shares.
Explanation:
- Uniform Probate Code is applicable in almost 18 states of the United States that was developed to standardize the laws of wills, trusts, and intestacy.
- The option a is not correct as Elsie can't get the half of the farm as Don and Elsie were divorced.
- The option b is also incorrect as Elsie can't get the half of farm as well as Hal will not get the share.
- The option c is correct as it is in accordance with Uniform Probate Code.
- The option d is incorrect as state can't inherits the entire estate in the presence of heirs.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation and journal entries are shown below:
1.. The total compensation cost is
= 15 million × $3 per share
= $45 million
2.
On Jan 1
Deferred compensation expense $45 million
To Common Stock $15 million
To Additional paid in capital $30 million
(Being expense is recorded)
3.
On Dec 31
Compensation expense ($45 ÷ 3) $15 million
To Deferred compensation expense $15 million
(Being expense is recorded)
The annual premium for Zack's house would be <u>cheaper</u> through <em>AAA </em>than <em>Thompson’s Insurance. </em>
<h3>How to calculate the annual premium of two companies? </h3>
AAA company is offering $0.36 per $100 of value.
Thompson company is offering $3.63 per $1,000 of value;
Hence, <u>0.363</u> is higher than 0.36, which makes <em>AAA company </em>more beneficial for insurance.
Learn more about premium calculation here:
brainly.com/question/2644714
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true since acceptance strategy is a risk management technique in which small risks with little impacts on the organization are identified but not curtailed just because the impacts of such identified risks are not beyond what the company can bear.
Thus, possibly rendering the managers unable to conduct proactive security activities and portray an apathetic approach to security in general.
