In this scenario, the teenage group can be referred to as a minority.
The majority of people who like the drink are no teenagers. The majority of drinkers are 30-40.
Answer: b. a lower interest rate than
Explanation:
A protective convenant is also referred to as a restrictive covenant and it is referred to as an agreement whereby a particular company is restricted from doing certain things while a contract is still ongoing.
In this case, when a firm issues debt with no protective covenants in the indenture then the firm's debt will probably be issued at lower interest than similar debt with protective covenants. The reason for this is that the lender is protected when there is a convenant which ultimately lower the cost of debt.
Answer:
c. $215,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount charged to income is shown below:
But before that first we have to determine the book value as on Jan 2024 which is
Total patent cost
= $200,000 + $50,000
= $250,000
Amortized cost till year 2024 is
= ($250,000 ÷ 10 years) × 3 years
= $75,000
The three years is counted from 2021 to 2024
Now
Book value on Jan 2024 is
= $250,000 - $75,000
= $175,000
So,
Amount charged to income is
= $175,000 + $40,000
= $215,000
Answer:
InstallCourses
SWOT ANALYSIS ›FMCG ›
Strepsils SWOT Analysis, Competitors, STP & USP
Published by MBA Skool Team, Last Updated: April 20, 2020
SWOT analysis of Strepsils analyses the brand by its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities & threats. In Strepsils SWOT Analysis, the strengths and weaknesses are the internal factors whereas opportunities and threats are the external factors.
SWOT Analysis is a proven management framework which enables a brand like Strepsils to benchmark its business & performance as compared to the competitors. Strepsils is one of the leading brands in the FMCG sector.
The table below lists the Strepsils SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats), top Strepsils competitors and includes its target market, segmentation, positioning & Unique Selling Proposition (USP).
Answer:
The retained earnings statement showed a closing retained earnings of $226,120.00 as at 2017 year end.
Explanation:
In arriving at the closing retained earnings , I treated prior items retrospectively- that is as if the impact of such items have been in the accounts from day one,less the tax effect of all items involved.
For instance ,I deducted the understatement of depreciation in 2015 less of tax impact of 40%
Kindly find attached for details.
