All categories

3 years ago

What happened in 1935 with the United States Congress surrounding employee benefits?

1 answer:

7 0

The social security act was passed by the congress in 1935 which led to the adoption of private pension plans which led the older people to retire and younger ones to come and work.

<u>Explanation:</u>

An act to accommodate the general welfare by building up an arrangement of Federal mature age benefits, and by empowering the few States to make increasingly sufficient arrangement for matured people, daze people, reliant and injured youngsters, maternal and kid welfare, general well being, and the organization of the jobs for the jobless.

The Social Security Act and related laws build up various projects that have the accompanying fundamental purposes: To accommodate the material needs of people and families; To ensure matured and debilitated people against the costs of ailments that may somehow or another utilization up their reserve funds.

You might be interested in

What does total number of allowances you are claiming mean.

Svetach [21]

Answer:

mean the amount you are getting

Explanation:

Hope this help

3 0

2 years ago

A monopolist finds that a person’s demand for its product depends on the person’s age. The inverse demand function of someone of

KiRa [710]

Explanation:

A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone wrong in the manufacturing process, at most 7 chips each lot would be defective, but if something does go wrong, there could be far more defective chips. If something goes wrong with a given lot, they discard the entire lot. It would be prohibitively expensive to test every chip in every lot, so they want to make the decision of whether or not to discard a given lot on the basis of the number of defective chips in a simple random sample. They decide they can afford to test 100 chips from each lot. You are hired as their statistician.

There is a tradeoff between the cost of eroneously discarding a good lot, and the cost of warranty claims if a bad lot is sold. The next few problems refer to this scenario.

Problem 8. (Continues previous problem.) A type I error occurs if (Q12)

Problem 9. (Continues previous problem.) A type II error occurs if (Q13)

Problem 10. (Continues previous problem.) Under the null hypothesis, the number of defective chips in a simple random sample of size 100 has a (Q14) distribution, with parameters (Q15)

Problem 11. (Continues previous problem.) To have a chance of at most 2% of discarding a lot given that the lot is good, the test should reject if the number of defectives in the sample of size 100 is greater than or equal to (Q16)

Problem 12. (Continues previous problem.) In that case, the chance of rejecting the lot if it really has 50 defective chips is (Q17)

Problem 13. (Continues previous problem.) In the long run, the fraction of lots with 7 defectives that will get discarded erroneously by this test is (Q18)

Problem 14. (Continues previous problem.) The smallest number of defectives in the lot for which this test has at least a 98% chance of correctly detecting that the lot was bad is (Q19)

(Continues previous problem.) Suppose that whether or not a lot is good is random, that the long-run fraction of lots that are good is 95%, and that whether each lot is good is independent of whether any other lot or lots are good. Assume that the sample drawn from a lot is independent of whether the lot is good or bad. To simplify the problem even more, assume that good lots contain exactly 7 defective chips, and that bad lots contain exactly 50 defective chips.

Problem 15. (Continues previous problem.) The number of lots the manufacturer has to produce to get one good lot that is not rejected by the test has a (Q20) distribution, with parameters (Q21)

Problem 16. (Continues previous problem.) The expected number of lots the manufacturer must make to get one good lot that is not rejected by the test is (Q22)

Problem 17. (Continues previous problem.) With this test and this mix of good and bad lots, among the lots that pass the test, the long-run fraction of lots that are actually bad is (Q23)

7 0

2 years ago

Compute gross profit earned by the company for each of the four costing methods. For specific identification, the March 9 sale c

vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Gross profit earned by the company for each of the four costing methods = Subtraction of Total cost of goods sold from Total Sales

$48,322 - $30,651 = $17,671

Explanation:

Total sales = (330 x 87.4) + (200 x 97.4) = $48,322

Total cost of goods sold overweighted average method = $30,651

Subtract $48,322 from $30,651 to give $17,671 as the gross profit.

In the attached picture, Your will see average costs calculated and the inventory values for March 5, 9, 25, and 29.

4 0

3 years ago

Phillips NV produces DVD players and exports them to the United States. Last year the exchange rate was $1.25/euro and Phillips

vichka [17]

Answer: The exchange rate pass through is 41.7 = 6.666666667%÷16%

Explanation:

Currently, from last year to the current year, there has been a 16% increase change in the exchange rate and a 6.667% change in the price. The exchange rate pass through is 41.7 = 6.666666667%÷16%

For every increase in 1% of the exchange rate, there has been a 41.7% increase in the current price of the DVD player.

5 0

3 years ago

A store accidentally priced an item at $20 instead of $30 and honored the mispricing. where should the $10 difference

dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

The difference is attributed to sales.

Explanation:

The difference of $10 will be attributed to sales because $20 is charged instead of $30 which means selling price has been changed. However, it cannot be considered as a loss because the cost price is not given. It might be the actual cost price for the item is $15 and the store is selling at $20 instead of $30. So, in this case, the store is making a profit of $5. Thus, the difference is considered as the sale difference.

4 0

3 years ago