Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
Hello! So because the value in the parenthesis is less than one, this represents exponential decay. 0.75 is 75% in decimal form. Percents are parts of 100. let's multiply that number from 100. 100 - 75 is 25. There. The rate of depreciation is 25%.
Answer:
72
Step-by-step explanation:
the number in the middle
Answer:
5/6
Step-by-step explanation:
- 1 has a 1/6 chance
- 2 has a 1/6 chance
- 3 has a 1/6 chance
- 5 has a 1/6 chance
- 6 has a 1/6 chance
- 1, 2, 3, 5, or 6 has a 1/6+1/6+1/6+1/6+1/6=5/6 chance
