In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
Trade was very important to the Persians. By trading they became rich and wealthy. Hope this Helps.
Answer:
organizational behavior specialist
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that the individual that began working with them was an organizational behavior specialist. This is a psychologist who studies the behavior and interactions of individuals and groups within an organization. They are often hired to study this and find a solution to certain organizational problems and make sure that the workers are behaving as efficiently as possible.
Answer: C) people define themselves by their group affiliations.
Explanation: Social identity can be simply defined as the perception of an individual on who they are based on the membership they belong to.
Social identity theory is a theory about (in group) who we are and (out group) who they are, the in group will always look for issues to use against the out groups, there by tarnishing the image of the out groups and enhancing theirs.
So option (C); people define themselves by their group affiliations best illustrates social identity theory.
This is a difficult question. Are there any options?
