Answer: A person will never be able to reinterpret what you said the way that you intended your message to be delivered.
Explanation: For example, I could say "I was having the worst moment of my life, in a very depressing voice. Another person could translate my words "She was having the worst moment of her life, in a tone that doesn't come across as serious. Therefore it is very hard for someone to reinterpret your words in a way that you intended it to be.
***If you found my answer helpful, please give me the brainliest, please give a nice rating, and the thanks ( heart icon :) ***
If the story was told by a news reporter then the perspective and answer would be different cause they didn’t go through or experience it themselves.
Answer:
<u>Delegates from the convention would propose amendments, but the Constitution and the amendments would eventually be ratified.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
John Marshall who served as the fourth Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court held that if amendments were voted on <em>before </em>the Constitution was ratified,<em> Delegates from the covention (usually elected by voters in each state) would propose amendments, but the Constitution and the amendments would eventually be ratified.</em>
The poet's use of quotation marks and dramatic shift in word choice in this excerpt from "Attack the Water" suggest that these words are coming from another source, such as the news.
This accounts for the change in word choice, as the news, would have been written or spoken by someone else. Also, adding this to the poem helps describe the situation in Vietnam from an outside standpoint.
