Answer:
"Beowulf" presents the men as happy, rejoicing in the praises of their leader through the minstrel's song while Grendel presents a more horrific and extreme behavior of the men in the mead hall.
Explanation:
The epic narrative "Beowulf" by Seamus Heaney tells the story of the hero Beowulf and his actions, saving his people and the Danes from the menacing Grendel and his mother. On the other hand, the narrative of the same story but from a different perspective, "Grendel" by John Gardner tells the story from the monster's side. This presents a 'voice' for the monster greatly evaded and feared by the people.
<u>Heaney's text presents the men in the mead hall as calm and rejoicing, enjoying the party and satisfied with the praises of their leader</u>. They were <u>proud of their king's greatness and greatly accepts the exultations, happy with the song sung by the minstrel</u>.
On the other hand, <u>Gardner's version presents the men as wild and </u><em><u>"howling and clapping and stomping of men gone mad on art"</u></em><u>, driven out of control by the minstrel's songs of praise of their leader</u>. He concludes that they are <em>"a fire more dread than any visible fire"</em>.
One of the major contributions of classical Roman civilization was architecture. The architecture in Rome was modern which was not popular for that time. Romans were the firsts to use concrete to build things and they discovered that it allowed for their designs and constructions to last longer and survive harsh conditions. Wood and dirt structured buildings would hold up for a while, but concrete was much more reliable and it gave more structure. Another major contribution of classical Roman Civilization was the government. Their government was influential to other countries around the world because their government was strong and successful. Roman senators represented large groups of people and they ran Rome. Alongside the senators, there were Emperors who “ruled” Rome, but they did not do it alone or with absolute power. Having multiple people in power allowed Rome to meet the needs of all people rather than doing what one person (the ruler) thinks is best. This stopped Rome from having a leader with too much power during his reign of Rome.
The name of Kublai khan took after he integrated Chinese culture into mongol way was Yuan.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Kublai Khan was the founding father of the famous Yuan Dynasty and grandson of Genghis Khan. Kublai conquered China and he owned the fame of the first Mongols to conquer China. Also, he unified China with the Mongol way with his wise rule.
His distinguished rule from other rulers and the Chinese people also treated well under his rule. Moreover, he improved the infrastructure of the region by proving services like postal and grand canal extension.
Also, his religious tolerance was another advantage since he allowed the Chinese people to follow their traditions and religious ways. Also, under his rule, many scientific advancements were discovered like the Chinese calendar, the institute for medicine, accurate maps, etc.
Well that would be a democracy run by Jackson. Correct? And I think that would cause an imbalance in power.
