All categories

2 years ago

Is the relation shown below a function? Use the graph below to justify your response (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, 2), and (3, 4)

Mathematics

2 answers:

Scorpion4ik [409]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

No.

Step-by-step explanation:

No because the x-intercept repeat. If the y-intercept repeat it's ok, it would be a function, however if the x-intercept repeat the graph is NOT a function.

<u><em>Ace Carlos</em></u>

Gelneren [198K]2 years ago

5 0

Step-by-step explanation:

By looking at the points (2, 0) and (2, 2),

The x-value of 2 gives the y-values 0 and 2.

Since this is a one-to-many relationship,

it is not a function.

You might be interested in

Which expression is equivalent to x+0.2x?

GalinKa [24]

The expression equivalent to 0.2x is 0.1x

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

just add up both alternate internal angles as they are both equal

so, the equation is: 2x-10 = 65-x

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Someone please help me?

kow [346]

So hmmm recall the "inscribed angle theorem", notice the first picture

thus, check the second picture, recall, a flat line line AOD is 180° wide

8 0

2 years ago

Use properties of operations to write two equivalent expressions for 13(4 + x).

lesantik [10]

Answer:

13(4+x)

=52+13x

Step-by-step explanation:

13 multiplies the 4 and x.

then 13 multiply 4 is 52 while 13 multiply x 13x.

6 0

2 years ago

13<br> y <br> 3<br> Х<br> 4<br> What is y?

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

The Y Coordinate is always written second in an ordered pair of coordinates (x,y) such as (12,5). In this example, the value "5" is the Y Coordinate. Also called "Ordinate"i think

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago