When the debates over the 3/5th Compromise was had, in relation to the above options, the answer is none of the above.
<h3>What happened during the debate for the 3/5h compromise?</h3>
The delegates from the Southern part of the states argued that enslaved people should be treated as people if it came to voting and representation.
They did this to ensure that they would have more representation in Congress even though their population was less than the North.
Find out more on the 3/5th Compromise at brainly.com/question/744051.
The imperial presidency is a fact where the abuse of a power by a president makes it seem like an autocratic rule.
Explanation:
Imperial presidency is something that has happened more often than not in the nation in the times of conflict.
The power of the president is risen up in the time of a war or a major crisis and they are ultimately responsible for a lot of informal decisions that are never taken to court for not following the producer of law as there is an innate understanding on it in the wings of the government.
There are times when it is simply more viable to let the President make the decisions without following protocols but it is a murky territory.
Based on historical perspective, the South tried to justify the "<u>Chàttel Slàvery</u> by arguing that keeping slavery was a matter of states' rights, but the South also favored <u>Fúgitive Slàve Law</u> which took away Northern States' rights to protect enslaved people who had escaped to the North.
<h3>What is Chàttel Slàve?</h3>
The chàttel slàve is the form of slavery arrangement whereby an individual has the ownership of another man to work for him as he pleases, either at home or in fields.
During the debate on the abolition of slàvery between North and South, the Southern States argued that chàttel slàvery is no different than wage slàvery, and it should be the state's right to determine whether to be a slàve state or free state.
Again, during the debate, the south argued in favor of the <u>Fugitivé Slàve Law.</u> This law mandated Northerners to turn escaped slàves who moved to the North back over to their Southern owners, though it was against their rights to protect enslaved people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Chàttel Slàvery and Fugitíve Slàve Law accordingly.
Learn more about the Fugítive Slàve Law here: brainly.com/question/9505313
The words describe a very specific relation to slavery. It is in a sentence below:
Explanation:
The productivity of the farms had drastically decreased as the south was only able to acquire slaves from domestic slave trade making them costly.
This statement delves into the specific point of time in the mid 19th century when there was the end of the Atlantic slave trade and the essential pool of slaves in the country was what was available to them.
Thus, it was seen that the slaves became subject to domestic trade and had a higher price now.
