Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
Answer:
To protect their local markets and keep a health balance of payments.
Explanation:
They inhibit imports as those require forex and may hurt their own country's production and markets. They inhibit exports at times to prevent shortages of goods they require such as wheat when there is a drought or increases local demand.
Angela's. I'm pretty sure that's what the answer is.
Answer:
hindsight bias
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question you might be engaging in what is known by psychologists as hindsight bias. This is the phenomenon of individuals believing that they knew a certain event was going to happen only after the event actually happened.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
