1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
2 years ago
6

Was US Interference with affairs of other nations (China, Cuba, the Philippines, Hawaii, Panama) justified at any point? Use fac

ts to support your response.
History
1 answer:
Slav-nsk [51]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

US Interference with affairs of other nations is justified and explained below in details.

Explanation:

The US had a policy of separate noninterference for 150 years established by our first president, George Washington. President George Washington established the model that separate noninterference would be the most reliable way to assure our national safety. We attempted to continue uninvolved even though Eur-Asia had TWO WORLD WARS competed there. However, the strike on Pearl Harbor transformed everything. We no prolonged felt secure within our boundaries and understood that we had to actively engage the world to keep warnings away from our borders.

You might be interested in
What role does Merlin not play as mentor to Arthur in Arthurian lore?
mars1129 [50]
2.) prophet!! Hope this helps
3 0
1 year ago
Why was britain not as dependent on southern cotton as the confederacy had believed?
rusak2 [61]
Cotton could also be obtained from Egypt and India
6 0
3 years ago
What is being said about the strength of American democracy
Setler [38]

Answer:

America is just bad

Explanation:

xoxo britian

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Stamp Act of 1765 was the first internal tax levied directly on American colonists by the British Parliament. The issues of
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
How did SCOUTS defend their ruling in plessy v. Fergusson?
skad [1K]
In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. Segregation, the Court said, was not discrimination.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The part of ireland that was mostly protestant was _______.
    13·1 answer
  • What is globalization give an example
    13·2 answers
  • Of Roosevelt’s opponents, who was the most popular amongst the elderly?
    8·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Hi<br> Gfdghhjhgdsdfbhv Manchu for no Abidjan f Niagara
    11·1 answer
  • What crops allowed the Olmec population to grow?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a negative effect of urban sprawl as it relates to the concept of human-environment interaction?
    8·1 answer
  • What advantage did the soldiers in Philip's army have?
    6·1 answer
  • Plzz help fast due 9 min /math
    11·1 answer
  • Hkghgkhbkbkjhkhkjhkjhkjhkhjj
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!