Answer:
Thomas Dewey
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure it's Thomas Dewey.
Answer:
I think the three-fifths compromise was a poor attempt to delay the inevitable. I think that it would have been better to address slavery sooner. I think it should have been adressed when the constituion and bill of rights were written. I understand that it would have been a divisive issue but if you claim that "All men are created equal" and then turn around and dehuminaze other people than it makes you a hypocrite becuase you cannot just pick and choose who is and who is not considered human.
The three-fifths compromise did not do anything for the rights of the slaves in fact it dehumanized them even more and caused the civil war to start even sooner. If they had at least counted everyone as a human not only would it have possibly delayed the war but there may have been a way to keep the plantation owerners happy by saying they would have to pay anyone who worked for them and could not abuse them. If the slaves were treated as an entire person then they would have gained the population needed for more representation. It would have also helped them get the freedom they desereved and possibly avoid the civil war. It would have also helped the southern economy to have a higher and eventually more educated population. One cause of the civil war was the signfict difference in the economies in the north versus the south.
Explanation:
HE was the communist leader of China.
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Human Development Index.
The Human Development Index (HDI) takes into consideration several different factors in order to categorize nations as to levels of development. Some of the factors they use are:
A) A country's Gross National Income (GNI)
B) Life expectancy
C) Education of citizens (i.e. college degree, years of schooling for average citizen).
