hello there
Andrea's point is probably the answer you're looking for, however, you should keep in mind that many (most?) environmental laws are driven more by politics than by the available data. Scientists do research on any number of topics (environmental or not) that have implications for our society. We (scientists) like to think that policy makers take our data and results into consideration when drafting legislation, but I would say that in my experience this rarely happens. For one, there have rarely been any federal legislators who understand science. Even the few physicians who've gone into politics seem largely to fail to understand very basic tenets of science, or at least they don't often demonstrate it with their political actions. Leaving environmental issues, for example, if politicians took science into account, there would be no discussion in any school district in the country about whether or not evolution should be taught in schools, as there are simply *NO* scientists who are qualified to have an opinion who would suggest it shouldn't. Environmental issues are not really any different.
hope that helped bye
Answer:
by praying for understanding to God almighty
Explanation:
The other type of a region that characterises low precipitation would also be a semiarid or a steppe. In addition, this specific kind of region usually consists of little to no vegetation. The area could only grow grasses and no trees can be seen in this region because of its barren descriptions.
If my memory serves me well, the answer should be: When the Congo River reaches Kinshasa, <span>it flows slowly into the Atlantic. Congo River is the second largest lake in the world. It takes a long way to reach the Atlantic: In the middle it flows towards Matadi and divides into several arms and finally it freely flows into the Atlantic.</span>
Answer:
If a spacecraft is in space for a long time, radiation is a problem. Designers must figure out a way to protect astronauts from the radiation.
