Answer:
$315,600
Explanation:
Ownership = 40%
Investment = $182,000
Share of dividends = 40%*21,000 =8400
Share of income = 40%*75000 = 30000
Increase in share price = $21-$13= $8
investment
Dr Cr
Investment $182,000
Dividend received $8400
Income received $30,000
Increase in share price $112,000
324,000 315,600
The firm’s marginal cost of production when the firm is producing 50 units of output is 33.33
Solution:
The production function is Q = 
The initial value is 10 units. The production value is 50 units The manufacturing cycle needs work as stated below.
Q =
Q = 
L = 
The wage rate is $15 . The following is the expense of the manufacturing process.
TC = 
TC = ![( 15 * (\frac{Q}{3.162} )^{2} ) + [ P_{k * 10}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%2015%20%2A%20%28%5Cfrac%7BQ%7D%7B3.162%7D%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%29%20%2B%20%5B%20P_%7Bk%20%2A%2010%7D%5D)
The marginal production cost is really the increase in manufacturing costs as output increases by 1 point.
As listed below, the marginal cost:
TC =
MC = 
= 
MC = 
= 33.33
Answer:
$570,000
Explanation:
At the time of recording of the fixed assets, the fixed assets should be reported at purchase cost or historical price or originally cost or acquiring cost, whether all other values are given i.e appraisal value, the seller purchased value, similar warehouse book value, etc
So, in the given case, it would be recorded at $570,000 as the buyer purchase the building at this cost only.
Answer:
DM Cost per Equivalent unit: 4.25
Explanation:
22400 beginning 60% materials 20% conversion
140,000 started
33600 ending 90% materials 40% conversion
Beginning Inventory
DM 71,160
DL 26,610
MO 20,110
Conversion Cost 46,720
Cost during the month
DM 618,800
DL 241,330
MO 513,600
Conversion Cost 754,930
Equivalent units Materials
22,400 * .4 8,960
140,000 140,000
33,600 * .1 (3,360)
145,600
DM Cost per Equivalent unit: 4.25
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
