A=h(b+c)
A/h=b+c
b=(A/h)-c
Answer: b=(A/h)-c
Answer:49/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Improper fraction
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I think its A
Answer:
1 $16.50
2 $28.50
3 $40.50
$4.50 + $12c
$100.50
Step-by-step explanation:
Please find attached the complete question
Total cost in dollars = fixed cost + (variable cost x number of CDs bought)
fixed cost = $4.50
variable cost = $12
number of cds bought = c
total cost in dollars = $4.50 + $12c
total cost in dollars when 1 cd is bought = $4.50 + $12(1) = $16.50
total cost in dollars when 2 cds are bought = $4.50 + $12(2) = $28.50
total cost in dollars when 3 cds are bought = $4.50 + $12(3) = $40.50
total cost in dollars when 8 cds are bought = $4.50 + $12(8) = $100.50
Answer:
H0: μd=0 Ha: μd≠0
t= 0.07607
On the basis of this we conclude that the mean weight differs between the two balances.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null and alternative hypotheses as
H0: μd=0 Ha: μd≠0
Significance level is set at ∝= 0.05
The critical region is t ( base alpha by 2 with df=5) ≥ ± 2.571
The test statistic under H0 is
t = d/ sd/ √n
Which has t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom
Specimen A B d = a - b d²
1 13.76 13.74 0.02 0.004
2 12.47 12.45 0.02 0.004
3 10.09 10.08 0.01 0.001
4 8.91 8.92 -0.01 0.001
5 13.57 13.54 0.03 0.009
<u>6 12.74 12.75 -0.01 0.001</u>
<u>∑ 0.06 0.0173</u>
d`= ∑d/n= 0.006/6= 0.001
sd²= 1/6( 0.0173- 0.006²/6) = 1/6 ( 0.017294) = 0.002882
sd= 0.05368
t= 0.001/ 0.05368/ √6
t= 0.18629/2.449
t= 0.07607
Since the calculated value of t= 0.07607 does not falls in the rejection region we therefore accept the null hypothesis at 5 % significance level . On the basis of this we conclude that the mean weight differs between the two balances.
