First of all, we need to establish two definitions here. the first one is Americanism that is the attachment to ideas and traditions in the USA, basically being an absolute patriot.
The second word is fiend which is a person who has negative intentions towards your feelings and in general, to anything other people value.
Taking this in consideration we can say that the correct answer is It develops the conflict by establishing the fact that Judge Lenon is unforgiving when he feels that someone has been unpatriotic since he is a fiend for Americanism he won't stop in his objective of going against anything that is opposite to his beliefs.
The other options are not correct because they talk about the use of vocabulary more than its meaning and the last one talks about corruption which is not mentioned in the excerpt.
Answer:
yes,because it would be fun and it would be free
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I would respond to an attorney who argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception, in the following way.
People have the right to exert their own freedom to the degree they do not mess with my freedom of defending my privacy or they do not mess with the privacy of other people.
So this means paparazzi have the freedom to allow for the best shots of artists or public figures when these public figures are in a public sphere or scene: working, public appearances, red carpets, and so on
But there is a fine but notorious line that these paparazzi must never cross. And that is the private life of people. And that always must be respected, no matter what.
Private life is of no interest to the audiences.
