Reducing prison overcrowding, the costs of dealing with offenders, and helping offenders avoid the stigma of incarceration are all advantages of societal protection.
- During their time in jail, prisoners can lose all that matters to them, and after their release, they frequently struggle to reintegrate into society.
- Crime committed by people in high social positions while performing their jobs is known as. white collar crime
- Prison advocates frequently claim that the punishment of imprisonment can be justified by taking into account many of the various goals of punishment mentioned above.
- Specifically through its incapacitative and deterrent effect, as well as through its ability to change and rehabilitate, and the idea that a prison sentence.
What is the oldest justification for punishing an offender?
- The first reason for punishment, retribution, can be found in the arguments put out by Kant and Hegel (Brooks, 2001).
- The fact that the person committed a wrongdoing is what warrants punishment .
Learn more about societal protection brainly.com/question/14332237
#SPJ4
The American sociologist, <u>Charles Wright Mills </u>was a professor at Columbia University from 1946 till 1962, the year of his death. He is famous for his book “<em><u>The Power Elite</u></em>” in which he describes the alliances and relationships the elites have in politics, economy and military.
Question: Why would C. Wright mills consider a member of congress to belong to the power elite?
Answer: A) because the person can make important decisions
Monumental ancient egyptian architectural achievement could be described as the intersection of mathematics and religion.
The calculation of egypt's ancient monument is so complex it's impossible to achieve without advanced math and it used by ancient egyptians for religious purposes.
hope this helps
Answer: A. Stare decisis
Explanation: Stare decisis simply means aligning with precedence. Stare decisis is a legal culture which necessitates the court to look into preceeding cases when making rulings on similar cases. It obligates the court that when making ruling on a certain cases, rulings preceeding cases of similar nature, fact and structure must be considered.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the court is following legal precedent set by the ruling of a previous case in other to make decision on a current case. Therefore, the second case is an example of stare decisis.
