Answer: Maximize joint welfare in respective or the right owner.
Explanation: A coase solution to a problem of externality insures that a socially efficient outcome is to maximize the joint welfare, irrespective of the right of ownership.
The Coase theorem states that when transaction cost are low, two parties will be able to bargain and reach an efficient outcome in the presence of an externality.
Answer:
its B don't listen to stupid people
Explanation:
Answer:
it might be informative and persuasive I'm pretty sure it is but not 100% I'm sorry
Answer: Option A -- Choosing low is a weakly dominant strategy for Apple.
Explanation: Dominant strategy in a game theory can be defined as the course of action that occurs when one strategy/player is better than the other strategy/player regardless of what the other player does or how well the other player may play. dominant strategy is all about a player who has the highest favours in a game. Considering the above matrix, we know that Apple has the dominant strategy. And for apple to choose low is a weakly dominant strategy for it.
Answer:
Sarah has invested in sole proprietorship while Jane has invested in corporations
Explanation:
Sole proprietorship is owned and run by a single owner who is legally obligated for all business assets and liabilities. Since Sarah has invested thousands of dollars in one company, it looks like she has invested in sole proprietorship in which she is the owner.
Corporation is run by group of people who are not legally obligated for the assets and liabilities of the corporation. People can invest in more than one corporation as they are open for public offer. These investors earn dividends based on the earnings earned by the corporations So, possibly Jane has invested hundreds of dollars in different large companies.
