Answer:
D.All the above
Explanation:
The revolution of 1830 is the transfer of power from the Bourbon house to the Orleans house, under the principle of popular sovereignty over the king’s divine right and the establishment of a liberal regime in France. In 1848, there was the bourgeois-democratic revolution, whose task was to establish civil rights and freedoms (which subsequently resulted in the Louis Philippe I abdication of the throne and the proclamation of the Second Republic).
Both revolutions represented a movement towards the expansion of the democratic rights and freedoms of the French; the first one was anti-monarchist (against the Bourbons), while the second was anti-oligarchic.
Because they were different from other city-states
I believe that is the correct answer
The main effect that the geography of Japan had on its governance and history was that it forced rulers to launch a large number of invasions, since the small island had relatively few resources of its own.<span />
Answer:
"Emile Durkheim" would be the right response.
Explanation:
- He seems to have been a prominent French philosopher as well as a social scientist, recognized throughout his methods, mixing experimental evidence with theoretical frameworks, as those of the founder including its institution of sociology.
- The atmosphere has indeed been produced progressively "associated" by emerging technologies than ever now.
- The worldwide web, compounded because of all the wonderful devices researchers have used to link to something that has provided everyone greater accessibility, enhanced opportunity for community networking websites, and allowed us to keep our money.
Answer:
In 1215, a band of rebellious medieval barons forced King John of England to agree to a laundry list of concessions later called the Great Charter, or in Latin, Magna Carta. Centuries later, America’s Founding Fathers took great inspiration from this medieval pact as they forged the nation’s founding documents—including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
For 18th-century political thinkers like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, Magna Carta was a potent symbol of liberty and the natural rights of man against an oppressive or unjust government. The Founding Fathers’ reverence for Magna Carta had less to do with the actual text of the document, which is mired in medieval law and outdated customs, than what it represented—an ancient pact safeguarding individual liberty.
“For early Americans, Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence were verbal representations of what liberty was and what government should be—protecting people rather than oppressing them,” says John Kaminski, director of the Center for the Study of the American Constitution at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Much in the same way that for the past 100 years the Statue of Liberty has been a visual representation of freedom, liberty, prosperity and welcoming.”