Answer:
quality of life
Explanation:
The consumers have the right to have an influence on products and marketing that will help with the quality of life. This leds to proposals that are related to this right that look to avoid a big amount of messages in an advertising that distract from the main idea and to be informed about the materials or ingredients used in goods. According to this, the answer is that proposals related to quality of life include controlling the ingredients that go into certain products and packaging as well as reducing the level of advertising "noise."
Answer:
$1,102,820
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is shown below:
= Present value of yearly cash inflows - initial investment
where,
Present value of yearly cash inflows is
= Annual year cash inflows × PVIFA factor
= $300,000 × 2.9906
= $897,180
And, the initial investment is
= $1,500,000 + $500,000
= $2,000,000
So the net present value is
= $897,180 - $2,000,000
= $1,102,820
Answer:
nonprofit distributing
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the board members are practicing nonprofit distributing. This term refers to an organizational structure in which the profit the organization makes is reinvested in services to grow the business as opposed to being distributed to the shareholders. Which is what the company in this scenario is doing by using the money they have made in order to hire a new skillfull CEO.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": for negligence because the harm was foreseeable.
Explanation:
In Law, foreseeability is a concept related to what the proximate causes could be after an event. The concept is helpful to determine the limit of liability according to the primary event that happened and the type and manner of harm. The harm caused by rescuers like firefighters and negligence of health care providers like doctors and nurses is considered foreseeable.
<em>In Emmy's case, the repeated thefts to the store where she works while having a nonfunctioning alarm (negligence) make the store owner liable for the injuries caused by a perpetrator who broke Emmy's leg during a robbery since that event was foreseeable.</em>