The point satisfying the inequality is (3,-10)
3 - (-10) = 3 + 10 = 13 and > 0
(1. What is the high temperature today?
(2. What was the average high-temperature last week?
(3. How old are the science teachers at HGMS?
let me know if i’m wrong
The second option has a lower amount of interest paid.
In order to determine the loan option that minimizes loan payment, the future value of both loan options has to be determined.
FV = P (1 + r)^nm
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
m = number of compounding
N = number of years
<em><u>First loan option </u></em>
65000( 1 + 0.063/12)^300 = 312,707.21
<em><u>Second loan option </u></em>
65000( 1 + 0.048/12)^240 = 169,435.51
A similar question was answered here: brainly.com/question/23082103
-5y=12-3x (subtract 3x from both sides)
y = - 12-3x/5 (divide both sides by -5)
y = - 3(4-x)/5 (common term is 3)
no it cant. irrational number is any real number that cannot be expressed as a ratio.
