Answer:
reactive
Explanation:
Societies who made reactive change only make it in order to adapt Rather than do it for a certain cause or principles.
In the example above, BP's already know that their method of over exploitation could possess a risk for oil spilling, and yet they did not make the necessary effort to prevent it.
After the explosion occurred and the spilled oil damaged the nearby environment, BP decided to make a change by containing surface oil and Utilizing chemical oil dispersal to separate the oil that is spilled underwater.
BP made the change in reaction after the accident occured, not before. Which is why we consider this as a reactive change.
The answer is to help keep peace (With things like laws) and to keep everything running smoothly So things don't get out of control.
Well the gender doesn't really matter because ppl are always getting in trouble. However, There is a difference when if cone to who could become a victom. With woman they are the submissive typing and men are the dominate ones( 85% off the times) So women could fall victor more easily then men. Also men typicl are stronger and its harder to combat they.
Answer:
A. establish favorable security conditions
B. strengthen existing and emerging alliances and partnerships
C. secure the United States from direct attack
D. secure strategic access and retain global freedom of action
Explanation:
The United States Navy, Coast Guard and the marine Corps together established a new maritime strategy. According to this, they will organize, design and will employ the sea forces to provide support to the national security interests. This strategy is known as National Naval Strategy.
They will serve to establish partnerships among the existing as well as the newly emerging alliances in defense sector. They will ensure security conditions to United States and will protect from direct attack. They will work on securing some strategic access to the navy.
Answer:
no effect of such instructions on jurors' decision-making in passing a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
Pretrial publicity has been known to influence judges decisions in the past. This has however been condemned with new techniques put in place for an thorough trial.
Studies testing the effectiveness of judge's instructions to the jury to disregard pretrial publicity has been found to have no effect of such instructions on jurors' decision-making in passing a guilty verdict.
