Answer:
Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.
Explanation:
In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the<u> levels-of-processing effect</u> that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.
There are two main levels of processing: <u>shallow processing</u>, which has to do with fragile memory, and <u>deep processing</u><u>,</u> that involves a more durable memory trace.
<u>Deep processing</u> can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, <u>deep processing</u> can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.
Answer:
First-line manager
Explanation:
This term first-line manager describes the management level of the employees which are direct to the above of non-managerial employees. The first line manager task is to supervise the task in the company. It consists typically the post like a foreman, section head and the shift boss. The line manager is the first who look after for the information on worker satisfaction to the higher manager. It includes the organizational process.
Thus Mike supervises the work of the factory workers in automobile manufacturing. He is a first-line manager.
Hello there ^ _ ^
<span>In economics investment describes spending</span><span> that pays for the production and accumualation of capitial goods
Good luck!
</span>
Answer: unreliability
Explanation: Some of the problems that determine the quality of an experiment are reliability and validity.
Reliability considers the consistency of the experiment. In the example above, the result of the second sample is inconsistent with the result of the first sample, making Watt's research unreliable. That is, it does not reflect the ratings of a larger population. This problem can be solved by increasing the sample size, such that the average ratings are more reflective of a wider audience.
Validity considers the accuracy of the experiment. A lack of reliability of an experiment will likely make the result invalid as well, but this is not always the case.
They depended on the monsoons.
