Answer: Unreliable Narrator is the one who has his credibility compromised, either by lying or by presenting a questionable sanity. By telling lies, hiding information the narrator does not act in accordance with the narrative norms of the work. However, it is difficult to measure whether the reader really understands all the norms; after all, the narrator's contradiction can only be in opposition to the reader's understanding of that fictional world.
Thus, considering a narrative as unreliable can be configured as a kind of reader strategy that directs the narrator any and all interpretive discrepancies. Therefore, to question the credibility of the narrator it is also necessary to question the individual understanding of each reader.
The unreliable narrator's procedure contributes to the works maintaining the suspense character by narrating the actions inaccurately or incorrectly. The reader is waiting for when the narrator will be unmasked by any character or at what point in the plot will be evident that the sources used by the narrator are false or false.
The professor's suggestion best illustrates an<u> "evolutionary" </u>perspective.
To utilize an evolutionary perspective is to think about all practices, (for example, fears, biases, connections, and so on.) as the aftereffect of transformative procedures. This point of view takes the position that practices appeared because of adjustments to living conditions.
Evolutionary perspectives on human conduct are nearly as old as the study of brain research itself. developmental brain science is centered around how advancement has molded the psyche and conduct.
Human environment is greatly influenced by the ecosystem and nature.
Answer:Richard has 9 marbles.
Explanation:1st is less and 2nd is greater
