Just needed some points :)
<span>One way to confront the professor would be to ask her to explain once more how she got the conclusion that she did. This way could cause her to catch a mistake if she made. If there is no mistake and there is simply a disagreement, then a student could also continue to ask questions as the teacher is explaining the solution. What if type questions could also be asked. Asking questions is a good way of not being disrespectful to the teacher.</span>
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Answer: use
Explanation:
Substance use refers to ingesting drugs or alcohol, including cigarettes, illegal narcotics, prescription medicines, inhalants, and even some substances that are not drugs at all, such as solvents.
People such as Bob, using substances socially, are not necessarily addicts, nor have a substance use disorder. Only if they go into a pattern of harmful use, can we define it as substance abuse
They would be shocked and devistated and go into chaos
