The problem boils down to money, but I am assuming you are looking for the causes of the problem.
<span>1. Social Security was never indexed correctly to accommodate the growing life expectancy on those drawing on it. The age at which you can collect should have changed in concert with the life expectancy of the population, or the amount of the benefits should have been decreased if they wanted to keep the age at which you receive it from keeping pace with lefe expectancy. </span>
<span>2. The growth in income inequality has led to vast amounts of money being earned by fewer people and the tax on social security has a limit so any income over the limit is not subject to the tax. Right now that cap is around 109k/year...so someone making 125k/year pays the same amount into social security as someone making 10 million a year. As more wealth is concentrated with fewer people, even vast increases in income and/or wealth yields little increase to the amount collected via the SS tax. </span>
<span>3. Not necessarily on the scale as 1 and 2 above but fraud is also a cause of the monetary shortfall. There are those that cheat the system. Every so often you will hear stories of people getting caught in social security fraud rings where they collect either through identity theft or other criminal means. You also have people that will collect when a relative passes away. They will purposely not report the death or provide invalid SS information so they will continue to receive the deceased person's benefits long after they have died. </span>
<span>As far as a solution, you are stuck with the eventuality of either decreasing benefits, raising the retirement age, or increasing the amount of taxes collected...none of which are likely to fly in Congress. Programs like SS rely on growing the base of people from which you are collecting, but at some point this does not happen. Population growth is not automatic and even with population growth, the concentration of income at the top percent of people offsets any such growth. It may be considered a very progressive/liberal thought, but eliminating the cap on income from which SS tax is collected would help. You can still keep the cap on SS benefits meaning the people at the top of the income ladder would be paying far more than they would get out of it in 10 lifetimes...but this would neutralize the income inequality impact on the system. To be honest, if there was an easy solution, we would have done it by now.</span>
Answer:
Option: Offered economic assistance to non-communist governments.
Explanation:
The Marshall Plan designed as a Recovery Program and presented by George Marshall in 1948. The idea of the plan was to support Western European nations by giving them money to recover the economy, which hit in World War II. This plan also encouraged the reduction of Communism influence in Europe. Soviet Union during World War II seized many territories and began practising military and political power. The occupation of the Soviet Union in Europe led the United States to introduce the plan.
Answer:
hope this helps
Explanation:
Cultural factors also play a central role in resistance to social change. ... When technology enters a society, non‐material culture must respond to changes in material culture. Culture lag refers to the time during which previous aspects of a society still need to “catch up” to cultural advances.We call these three types of resistance: game change, outside game and inside game. This section will explain what makes each type of resistance effective, as well as how they complement one another.
Answer:
National beliefs and values for one's own nation and those for other nations do influence the social harmony. The function of government is to use force to ensure civil peace, justice, equality and liberty. Hence a Government should be honest, legitimate, democratic and accountable in order to promote social harmony.
Explanation:
Hope this helpss!!
