Answer:
Seeing as power was more important during the war as well as land, We have more advanced technology and sea craft than then. And leaders are less heated with eachother.
The correct answer is the space race is an important investment in America’s future; as such, America cannot afford to lose the space race to the Soviet Union.
The sentence that best describes the argument John F. Kennedy makes in his Rice’s speech at Rice University is that the space race is an important investment in America’s future; as such, America cannot afford to lose the space race to the Soviet Union.
On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech at Rice University in Houston, Texas. In the speech he said that the space race is an important investment in America’s future; as such, America cannot afford to lose the space race to the Soviet Union. He considered that one great investment for the future of the United States was the space race and that for no reason America should be left behind by the Russians.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
What President Roosevelt did which has never been done before in conservation was that the president made conservation a major part of his administration. He was a dynamic force in the new movement which was known as conservationism. The president saw the need to preserve natural resources and he put in place appropriate mechanisms to do this. At the end of his tenure, he had already built five national parks, four game refugees, fifty one national bird reservations and national forest service.
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:
The name of the power is Papal Supremacy
