this isn't a question so unless you give me the original or whole question I'm not sure how to answer
Answer:
B)tie-in sales.
Explanation:
Theses are the options for the question;
A. misrepresentation.
B. tie-in sales.
C. reciprocity.
D. price discrimination.
E. kickbacks
From the question, we are informed about a statement ""I'll let you sell the Harley-Davidson designer clothes only if you'll also sell a new line of clothes designed by Paula Abdul, too."
This statement made by a salesperson to a specialty retailer is potentially an example of tie- sales and may be in violation of the Clayton Act prohibition if the action substantially lessens competition.
It should be noted that tie - in sales in finance means that when a cusumer buys a goods he/she must buy the other product, it simply means the products are tied, and this is opposite of Clayton Act which was set up to bring end to transactions that can lead to monopolies.
Harriet is the person that can claim the earned income credit because the divorce decree gives Harriet the right to claim Preston as a dependent.
<h3>What the law on divorce states</h3>
The law on divorce or separation decree states that the noncustodial parent may claim the dependent even when there is no written declaration from the custodial parent.
Other explanation includes:
- The parent who the child spends the most time with may claim the dependent.
- If only one of the taxpayers is the child’s parent, that parent may claim the dependent.
In conclusion, Harriet is the person that can claim the earned income credit because the divorce decree gives Harriet the right to claim Preston as a dependent.
Read more about income credit
<em>brainly.com/question/13522402</em>
