Answer:
The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.
Explanation:
Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.
Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.
Answer:
It is decreased by the sale amount
Explanation:
An income statement is a financial statement that communicates a business's profitability. An income statement lists the revenues and expenses incurred by a business in a period.
The sale of a company's asset may result in a loss or profit. A profit is treated as an income to the business, but a loss is an expense. When an asset is sold at a loss, business expenses increase. An increase in expenses reduces profits as reported in the income statement.
Answer:
National Culture.
Explanation:
National Culture can be understood as a belief, customs, and traditions that are shared among the people of a sovereign nation. This may also include religious backgrounds and traditions, language and racial identity of the individuals. According to Geert Hofstede, National culture is very important while dealing with various cultural issues and processes. Therefore, he has identified national culture as the component of our mental programming, which we share with other citizens around the world. National culture acts as an identity proof as per one's nationality.
Answer: The longer the time period that funds are invested, the greater the future value.
Explanation:
When we are discussing about the time value of money, we are simply saying that it's better for one to have money today than wait till the future to have that particular amount of money. For example, if someone tells you to either collect $100 today or wait till next month to collect the $100 bill. According to the time value of money, it's better to collect it now as the person can invest with it and by the time it's a month, the value of the money will be more than $100.
The longer the time period that funds are invested, the greater the future value. This is because for example if for example one keeps $100 for 1 year at 6% per annum, the interest will be $6 for a year but if it's kept for 5 years, the simple interest will be $30.
This shows that the longer the time period that funds are invested, the greater the future value.
