The amount of money I would have in US dollars would be $1,000
<h3>How much would I have in US dollars?</h3>
The first step is to convert dollars to pesos:
$1000 x 10 = 10,000 pesos
The second step is to determine the value of the investment in a year's time: (1.10) x 10,000 = 11,000 pesos
Now, convert pesos to dollars : 11,000 / 11 = $1,000
To learn more about exchange rate, please check : brainly.com/question/25780725
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer to this question is (c) Labour, Labour intensive
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Explanation:
The Heckscher-Ohlin model is an economic theory that proposes that countries export what they can most efficiently and plentifully produce.
The model emphasizes the export of goods requiring factors of production that a country has in abundance. It also emphasizes the import of goods that a nation cannot produce as efficiently. It takes the position that countries should ideally export materials and resources of which they have an excess, while proportionately importing those resources they need.
Therefore in regard to the question above,
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Hence the answer is the third option, Labour, Labour intensive
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
- Federal Income tax ⇒ $80
- FICA ⇒ $125.46
- State income tax ⇒ $52.97
- Local deduction - Clark County Income tax ⇒ $29.52
Explanation:
Brent gets paid semi-monthly so his pay per period is:
= 39,360 / (12 months *2)
= $1,640
Based on the table therefore, his federal tax is:
= $80
This figure is based on the intersection between income of $1,640 and 3 withholding allowances.
FICA tax rate is 7.65% so his FICA tax is:
= 1,640 * 7.65%
= $125.46
State income tax = $52.97
Local deduction - Clark County Income tax = $29.52
Total deductions:
= Federal tax + FICA + State income tax + Clark County income tax
= 80 + 125.46 + 52.97 + 29.52
= $287.95
