What are the answer choices?
Binsey Poplars is full of unusual language, internal rhyme, alliteration, assonance, sprung rhythm and repetition. Hopkins developed his own unique sprung rhythm, based on a much older metric tradition with roots in Greek song and Welsh poetry.
Answer:
Investigation
Explanation:
Through investigation, it was discovered that Customer C killed Fannin. The first piece of evidence that proves that Customer C killed Fannin is that his silverware was on the left side of his platter. His coffee cup was ALSO on the left side of his plate. Typically, if the silverware and cups are placed on the left-hand side of the plate, it means that the diner is left-handed. The conclusion can be drawn that C is left-handed. The second piece of evidence that proves that Customer C killed Fannin is that there was a right handprint on the wall. As a rule, if there is a right handprint on the wall, the shooter pulled the trigger with his left hand. Since C is left-handed, it can be drawn that he/she pulled the trigger. The final piece of evidence that points to C as the murderer is that
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
Answer:
a) it shows the man is distressed about the situation.
