I am sorry I am a bit lost. Could you elaborate more?
Answer:
The other choices the characters might have made are:
1. Mathilde Loisel could have gotten a natural flower as suggested by her husband.
2. Mathilde Loisel could still have attended the ball without a necklace.
3. Her husband shouldn't have suggested borrowing from Madamme Forestier.
Explanation:
Mathilde Loisel and her husband were preparing to attend an event and she discovered she didn't have any ornament to accompany her dressing. Her husband suggested to her to get a natural flower and make do with it but she wasn't satisfied. Then he further suggested to her to borrow from her friend, Madamme Forestier which she finnally opted in.
"The Necklace" is a short story by a French author known as Guy De Maupassant. The story setting took place in France several hundred years ago. Mathilde Loisel and her husband lives in a flat; they are not luxurious couples, but simple and are not poor. Mathilde, however, always longs to be rich as a result, she tends to envy her friend Jeanne who was rich and had lots of jewelry.
Answer:
Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar
'Roman historian Appian lamented, “The people hoped that [Caesar] would also give them back democracy, just as Sulla had done, who had achieved a position of equal power. However, they were disappointed in this.”'
This shows Caesar was just as bad as Sulla. People were hoping that they would get back their democracy but Caesar didn't give it back much to their chagrin.
Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar
"As Caesar made his way back to Rome, the Senate ordered him to disband his army. Caesar refused. Instead, on January 10 in 49 BCE, Caesar led his army in an attack on Rome."
This shows that instead of listening to the senate and following orders, he instead got things done through fear tactics.
Explanation: