Answer:
E) Cross-functional teams are used for developing new ideas and coordinating complex projects.
Explanation:
A cross-functional team is composed of members of the same hierarchical level but work in the different departments or areas of the organization, like finance, human resource, research and development, security and legal.
These members are usually the heads of offices of these departments who gather together to discuss, innovate and develop new ideas geared towards the advancement of the organization.
Goal congruence is a vital component in a cross-functional team.
Answer:
d. no one.
Explanation:
Since the issuer of the promissory note was originally Jake, he was the only responsible for the payment of the note. Once he dishonoured it, the note lost its value and no one can be responsible for it. A promissory note is an asset created as a counterpart liability of Jake wealth. If the note is exchanged many times, only the last holder will suffer jake's action
Answer: online is virtual (phone,site,ect) in person is face to face interaction
Explanation:
hope this helpeddddddd
The correct options for Which statements are true regarding the effect of this transaction on Stockits' financial statements are B. Stockholders' equity on the balance sheet increases. C. The financing activities section of the statement of cash flows increases.
Equity is something invested in the company by using its owner or the sum of the entire belongings minus the sum of the company's general liabilities. E.g., common stock, additional paid-in capital, favored inventory, retained income, and the amassed different complete earnings.
For most companies, high stockholders' equity shows more stable finances and greater flexibility in case of an economic or financial downturn. information stockholders' equity is one way that buyers can learn about the monetary health of a firm.
Your question is incomplete. Please read below for the missing content.
ma Rich purchased 100 shares of Stockits, Inc.'s $1 par value common stock from Stockists for $5 per share. Which statements are true regarding the effect of this transaction on Stockits' financial statements? (Select all that apply.)
A. A gains will be reported on the income statement.
B. Stockholders' equity on the balance sheet increases.
C. The investing activities section of the statement of cash flows increases.
D. The financing activities section of the statement of cash flows increases.
E. Stockholders' equity on the balance sheet decreases.
Learn more about Equity here brainly.com/question/1957305
#SPJ1
Answer: <em>Please refer to Explanation</em>
Explanation:
1. The fish in the river are considered <u>rival in consumption</u> and <u>non-excludable</u> whereas the fish in the private stream are <u>rival in consumption</u> and <u>excludable</u>.
When a good is said to be Rival in Consumption, it means if it is consumed by one person first, another person cannot get it which reduces their chances of getting the same good. Once Eric consumes or catches a fish, no one else can catch that fish which means fishing is a Rival in consumption activity.
When a good is said to be Excludable, it means that people can be prevented from accessing the good of they have not paid for it. The pond on Eric's property is private so people cannot just come in and fish. It is Excludable. Non-Excludable on the other hand is the inverse and means people who have not paid can access the good like the river in town.
2. In other words, the fish in the river are example of <u>common resource </u>and the fish in the private stream are an example of <u>private good</u>.
Common resources are available to everyone as they are in the public domain like the fish in the river. Private goods however are not in the public domain and ate meant to be accessed by only certain people like the private stream which is only accessible by Eric's family or whoever they want to have access to it.
3. Fishing in the river will likely lead to the <u>tragedy of commons</u> because of which of the following reasons?,
B. anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.
The Tragedy of the Commons is an Economic explanation of the situation whereby people who have easy access to a resource such as the river in this instance, are able to use it with little cost to them. This might lead to a situation where they use it to the detriment of others because they will fish more and this will reduce the amount of fish left for others.