Disproportional misconduct
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
D.) Most justices are communist kikes, and if not, are obedient to jews.
Answer:
court by mail,
Explanation:
If you want to sue someone who lives in another state, you will have to sue in the state where the person lives, not in the state where you live. Often you can file papers with the court by mail, but you'll have to follow the state's rules when serving the court papers on the defendant.
Answer:
A court holds members of an LLC personally liable for the debts of the organization. Court may pierce an LLC's veil if members: ... Fail to observe formalities- Members must treat the LLC like a separate organization.
plz give brainlist
hope this helped
