1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
2 years ago
5

In criminal trials, the defense calls its witnesses first. True False

Law
2 answers:
34kurt2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

False.

The defense <em>does not</em><em> </em>call its witnesses first.

<em>I hope this helped at all.</em>

rjkz [21]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In criminal trials, the defence calls its witnesses first. Appellate courts may rule on a case without ever hearing an oral argument.

You might be interested in
Hello, I kinda need help on this. This is my last thing to do for the day. So pls help and ty, have a wonderful day.
zzz [600]

Answer:

1.) Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size.

Congress did not have the power to tax.

Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce.

2.) if each state only has one vote regardless of size that means that California and maine would have the same amount of votes regardless of the population diffrence.

as of now are country relays on tax to do things like pave roads and funding for schools.

that basically means that they didnt have the power to regulate things like the railroads.

3.) I mean to be honest the reason the constitution was written was more then just the three failings it was a combination of all of the things that had gone wrong in the few years of the confederation.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information is considered.
jarptica [38.1K]

Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

<h3>What is economic espionage?</h3>
  • Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
  • Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
  • Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
  • Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
  • President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
  • It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
  • It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.

Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.

Know more about economic espionage here:

brainly.com/question/28218496

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Joe buys some watermelon seeds from a seed manufacturer's catalog. The catalog describes the seed Joe buys as "top quality." Joe
klio [65]

Answer:

Correct Answer:

E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.

Explanation:

As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.

<em>Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.</em>

7 0
2 years ago
Who holds the final authority on government power.
liraira [26]
The Supreme Court is the final authority in the government power. It is the highest of the branches
5 0
2 years ago
Which legal school of thought is illustrated in this dialogue? DONUT DAY AT THE OFFICE Part 7 Alison: (She stands during David's
andrezito [222]

Answer:

The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:

Law and economics school of thought.

Explanation:

The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws.  This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices.  This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the bill of rights protect individuals civil liberties
    13·1 answer
  • Judiciary is controlled by​
    11·2 answers
  • To follow the truth is our responsibility​
    10·2 answers
  • An untruth about a person that will likely do them harm is known as: A. Periodical B. Libel C. Obituary D. Publication
    12·1 answer
  • This is a prejudice that is leaning toward a positive or negative judgment on something; a personal judgment or opinion about a
    6·1 answer
  • The Virginian General assembly passes constitutional legislation who ratifies it
    10·1 answer
  • 3. When you pull into the middle of an intersection to properly
    13·2 answers
  • Why is it important to learn about the "others" and how is this done by Anthropologist?​
    7·1 answer
  • During the last 30 years, the role of law enforcement in preventing or dealing with juvenile delinquency has changed. Recent mod
    6·1 answer
  • A man buy a land for $ 1,500 after 15 years sold it for $ 45,000 how much he owes the IRS?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!