Answer:
1.) Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size.
Congress did not have the power to tax.
Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce.
2.) if each state only has one vote regardless of size that means that California and maine would have the same amount of votes regardless of the population diffrence.
as of now are country relays on tax to do things like pave roads and funding for schools.
that basically means that they didnt have the power to regulate things like the railroads.
3.) I mean to be honest the reason the constitution was written was more then just the three failings it was a combination of all of the things that had gone wrong in the few years of the confederation.
Electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.
<h3>
What is economic espionage?</h3>
- Economic espionage includes electronic hacking and illegal trespassing to obtain a competitor's proprietary information.
- Economic espionage is defined as the illegal or covert targeting or acquisition of sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information; proprietary economic information; or technological information.
- Using bribery, cyber-attacks, "dumpster diving," and wiretapping.
- Creating seemingly innocent relationships with US companies in order to gather economic intelligence, including trade secrets.
- President Clinton signed the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 into law.
- It criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.
- It is notable for being the first federal statute to broadly define and severely punish such misappropriation and theft.
Therefore, electronic hacking and illegal trespassing for the purposes of acquiring a competitor’s proprietary information are considered economic espionage.
Know more about economic espionage here:
brainly.com/question/28218496
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correct Answer:
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Explanation:
As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.
<em>Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.</em>
The Supreme Court is the final authority in the government power. It is the highest of the branches
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
