Reading ready player one was ok. And I say this because the plots in the story weren’t as exciting as any other story I would read but, the thought that went into the story was good. Like how the author of the book thought of which events should come first, and what should go one throughout the story. Another thing that I liked were the descriptive words the author used to help the reader visualize what is going on in the story. The author also did well on choosing the characters personality, and how it would help in certain events of the story. And this is why I think reading ready player one was not the best, or the worst book to read in my own opinion. :)
Quickly is the correct answer
The correct answer is A. Nonfiction writers are more often free to move about in time and space.
B is not correct because that is usually the characteristic of nonfiction, rather than fiction. C is incorrect because usually writers of fiction can embellish the facts because they are not based on actual information. D is incorrect because sometimes writers of nonfiction can express their passionate opinions, especially in essays.
Every paragraph has to have an antecedent and an anecdote to go with it to keep the topic of the paragraph where it's supposed to be. So it doesn't turn into a run on paragraph <span />
