All categories

3 years ago

Contrast the British Army and the Continental Army at the start of the war

1 answer:

5 0

At the start of the war, the Americans and the British armies were as different as night and day. The British were well-armed and well-supplied. They were veterans of wars fought in Europe as well as the colonies. The American army on the other hand was inexperienced and had little training. As a result, the Americans initially lost the early battles against the British. Later on, they were able to score a victory at Trenton and this helped the rebels continue the fight and later they were trained by European officers and eventually won their independence.

You might be interested in

Which statement best describes the United States' Cold War policy of containment?

sergeinik [125]

The cold war was everything but a war in my opinion. It's was just Threats and a bunch of showing off. It's known as the 'Cold' war because it was a verbal war, and nothing physical, although it could have lead to the end of the world. The united states diplomatically isolated nations that maintain friendly relations with communist states, key word diplomatically, that means nonphysical resolution to conflict. I would go with the last option, it seems to fit best, the other three are absurd.

Hope I helped. :)

3 0

3 years ago

The British achieved victories in all of the following battles except:

Pepsi [2]

Except A.) Vincennes

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What kinds of human resources do we need for enabling our country to reach the level of developed countries? ( its question of 1

levacccp [35]

Answer:

They include: Recruitment, learning and development, performance appraisal, compensation and succession planning.

Explanation:

Human resource development is the process by which an organisation adds value to their organisation by adding value to their employees. An example is an HR strategy which is an HR mission statement and HR vision, with concrete, high level actions about how to execute on this mission and vision

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority was a class action suit that alleged that public housing was, in effect Group of answer c

tester [92]

The class-action suit arises between the Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority alleged that public housing impacted government-sponsored segregation.

Option B is the correct answer.

<h3>What is a class action suit?</h3>

A class-action suit is a lawsuit filed by a particular person on behalf of the group of affected people against the accused party.

According to the provided case, the public housing was claimed by the government segregation which is being disputed in the class action suit. It provides dollars of money to the people of the US to acquire properties in residential areas.

Therefore, Government-sponsored segregation was alleged in the public housing under the class action suit in the provided case.

Learn more about the class action suit in the related link:

brainly.com/question/6330329

#SPJ1

4 0

2 years ago

analyze the following cartoon from the publication puck, published in 1900, titled divorce the lesser evil. what can be inferred

Flura [38]

The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>

This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.

This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.

From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.

At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.

Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.

Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701

8 0

2 years ago