True , Strenberg purposed a Triarchic ( three part ) theory of intelligence that said people may display more or less analytical intelligence , creative intelligence , practical intelligence . so practical intelligence is that which does not take from books or formal learning . It represent type of street smart , common sense that is learned from life experience. this intelligence may include certain abilties that people use to do specific jobs and these abilties may not get from general intelligence .
Answer:
For now, I could tell you that it is not expected a numerical prediction based on experimental measurements to be exact. There are always experimental mistakes that add error to the numerical predictions, not only attributed to the one doing it, but also to the equipment used.
For instance, when a compound is weighed on a balance you should always notice it has uncertainty (e.g. +-1 kg), this means that if the balance says 40 kg, the weight could be between 39 and 41 kg.
Regarding the second question, when you add more values with the same experiment, you can obtain an average value and the most important thing, a deviation that would allow you to include your result in a range.
For the last question, I would need more context.
Have a nice day.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>a. true</u>
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable search and seizure, or arbitrary arrests, by the government, and establishes how and why a search warrant can be issued when it states “no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Therefore, a GPS installation in a motor vehicle without a warrant is an example of an unreasonable search that violates people's privacy and the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution.
What about it it involved ernesto miranda because of murder
[email protected] and kidnapping
The correct answer is <em>C) "personal appeals"</em>.
When a speaker is searching for support in an audience it is very effective to refer to the friendship and loyalty that this audience has had towards the speaker until that moment and ask once again for their support regarding the upcoming decision-making process. This is a technique which political candidates use quite often during political meetings in the days prior to the election day. Proposals and the appliance of techniques such as exchange are no longer effective with such a tight deadline, leaving the personal appeal as the best way to reach an audience's emotions and get the necessary buy-in.
