Answer:
Giá trị sử dụng của một vật phẩm là bao gồm các tính chất có ích, công dụng của vật thể đó có thể thoả mãn một nhu cầu nào đó cho việc sản xuất hoặc cho sự tiêu dùng cá nhân. Tính có ích của một vật làm cho vật đó trở thành một giá trị sử dụng.
Answer:
Firstly, temperament makes it possible for people to be often easily distinguished on how they behave and react to things that go on around them, talking more about that inherited trait displayed by an individual that causes reactions to situations in the environment.
How temperament is viewed from the behaviorist perspectives.
Temperament is often what makes every individual unique, the way they accept others and how they react to their environment. Temperament in a long run is influenced by environmental factors that contribute to how behaviors are later shaped. Temperament is a motivator of behavior and may change over time, but could remain consistent, particularly throughout adulthood.
How temperament is viewed from the biological perspectives.
Individual temperament is believed to compose of innate behaviors, the genes that make this possible are not constant. However, it can be expected that a particular temperament is common to a family which suggests how it could be inherited, and a particular temperament could be common with people that live in a particular environment which suggests how the environment could shape people's temperament.
Answer: The way that these issues influenced exploration and colonization in North America was that their exploration was fueled by the desire to obtain more wealth, ,more power(politics), and to spread their religion. European nations established colonies in North America for this reasons. European colonization of North America had a devastating effect on the native population. Within a short period of time their way of life was changed forever. The changes were caused by a number of factors, including loss of land, disease, enforced laws which violated their culture and much more.
Explanation: I hope that sums it up mostly.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
