Two exceptions to the special passive activity rule for real estate activities provide the whole or partial offset of real estate rental losses against active or portfolio income, even when the business is otherwise regarded as a passive activity.
<h3>Which rules regarding passive activities for rental revenue are exceptions?</h3>
- You have a stake in the yearly commerce or economic activities.
- During the current tax year or at least 2 of the 5 tax years prior, the rental property was utilized primarily in that trade or company.
<h3>Only real estate is subject to passive loss restrictions, right?</h3>
Generally speaking, the following actions can result in passive losses (and income): leasing of equipment. Rental property (though there are some exceptions) a farm or a sole proprietorship in which the taxpayer has no substantial interest.
<h3>How can passive income be balanced?</h3>
Selling off your rental properties will help you make up for your passive losses. You don't actually have to sell the property that's causing the losses to balance them effectively. Any passive income will be offset by losses.
Learn more about special passive activity rule: brainly.com/question/28137310
#SPJ4
Answer:
$3,875
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Selling value of the home = $155,000
Commission rate = 5%
Share basis = equally
So, by considering the above information, the Muller received amount is
= Selling value of the home × commission rate ÷ share basis
= $155,000 × 5% ÷ 2
= $7,750 ÷ 2
= $3,875
By considering the all the information given in the question we can easily find out the received amount by the Muller
The existence of pre-tax cost of debt and post-tax cost of debt is due
to the acknoledgement of the tax benefit from issuing debt.There is no
tax benefit from paying divdends,so it makes no sense talking about
pre-tax,post-tax cost of equity for a firm.When you think about cash
flow to equity you can only assume that the taxes owed by the company
have already been paid.Now, the taxation over the income of the
shareholder is a whole different issue that does not take place in this
discussion,since it is not taken in consideration either in cost of
equity or cost of debt.
Answer:
The total liabilities amounts to $200,000
Explanation:
The total liabilities of Asmine Smith is computed as:
Total Liabilities = Owing on Condo + Owning a Car
where
Owning on Condo is $190,000
Owning a Car is $10,000
Putting the values above:
= $190,000 + $10,000
= $200,000
Note: Sum Insured under the Insurance Policy, is neither a liability nor assets. And Premium paid is an expense, will be treated as Current Assets.
