Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
Answer:
e. Increase by $4,500.
Explanation:
<u>Analysis of the effect of discontinuing Product Line C</u>
Income :
Rent Income $6,000
Savings : Fixed Costs - Avoidable $3,000
Total Income $9,000
Costs :
Opportunity Cost - Contribution Margin $4,500
Total Costs $4,500
Net Income (Loss) $4,500
therefore,
By discontinuing Product Line C, operating income for the company will likely Increase by $4,500
Because the Dyson provides the user with really clean floors and carpets, the Dyson is an example of utilitarian value
<h3>What is a Utilitarian Value?</h3>
This refers to the value that is received by a customer based on task-related behavior where there is a functional product aspect.
Hence, we can see that based on the fact that Dyson cordless vacuum cleaners offer a service for a price of $599 and gives really clean floors, they are an example of utilitarian value.
Read more about utilitarian value here:
brainly.com/question/14570851
#SPJ1
Answer:
That is $2,000 loss
Explanation:
After the hurricane Oscar received $140,000 for his loss, the adjusted basis for his property was $130,000 so he had a gain of 140,000- 130,000=$10,000.
According to Sec. 1033(a)(2) since the new property that was built (the replacement) was similar we will recognise the amount received from the insurance company ($140,000) to the extent that it pays for the replacement property.
That is
Gain or loss = amount paid by insurance company- cost of replacement property
Gain or loss= 140,000- 142,000
Gain or loss= -$2,000
That is $2,000 loss
As long as the marginal benefits are higher than the marginal costs you are better off continuing the activity.
Consider the example of eating pizza. Each slice of pizza gives you happiness and helps fill you up (marginal benefit), but each slice also has lots of calories and fat (marginal cost). As long as you are still hungry and getting enjoyment from eating, you should keep eating. But once you reach the point where you are too full then you should stop, because the costs now outweigh the benefits.