Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.
<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.
The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.
agreeing to continue the slave trade indefinitely
agreeing not to end the slave trade for at least 20 years
agreeing to end the slave trade immediately
agreeing to continue the slave trade for a maximum of 50 years
This is not a school question, is it? You are trivializing genocide. The way to do what you are asking, though, is to become informed and do well enough in school so that you can become a political scientist of historian, so that you can have a real voice and be heard and influence people.
Start by googling the Armenian genocide. No, start by trying to answer why it's wrong to say what you just said. Look the word up.
On December 7, 1941, the Japanese launched a surprise attack<span> on the U.S. naval base at </span>Pearl Harbor<span>. ... The day </span>after the attack<span>, President Franklin D. Roosevelt addressed a joint session of the 77th United States Congress. Roosevelt called December 7 "a date which will live in infamy".
Theres a video about this on YouTube and I'll give you a link to another way.....</span>https://www.google.com/search?q=What+were+two+immediate+effected+after+the+attack+of+Pearl+Harbor&oq... Hope this helps :)
Conflict is a clash between two opposing forces that creates the narrative thread for a story. Conflict occurs when the main character struggles with either an external conflict or an internal conflict.
