Live your life with nature
Relaxing for everybody
One with nature
Flamingos for life
Try to agree with nature
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
<u>Most of the office personnel assumed that Devon's home life was as </u><u><em>bland</em></u><u> as his uninteresting manner at work. </u>
Bland is the most accurate option to be the correct answer on this sentence due to its meaning, which is: <em>lacking strong features or characteristics and therefore uninteresting. </em>
As you can see, the following text on the same sentence mentions de word: <em>"uninteresting" </em>, which is basically a synonym of the word <u><em>bland</em></u> .
