Answer: a) had a longer growing season.
Explanation:
Option C
The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge how good the ideas are before the ideas can be published, is: A useful and important, even if imperfect, mechanism of quality-control for the scientific literature
<u>Explanation:</u>
The peer-review practice endures to approve scholarly work, accommodates to enhance the worth of proclaimed research, and builds networking circumstances in research areas. Notwithstanding critiques, peer review is yet the unique internationally affirmed system for research validation.
Peer review guarantees that documents undergo a fair evaluation and skillful opinion, enabling scholars to develop their script and therefore high-quality experimental interpretation and articles to be proclaimed. It also encourages the browsers to believe the scientific uprightness of the report and to present notified declarations where peer reviewer comments are ready.
Answer:hi
Explanation:
i am sorry i do not speak that language
Answer:
1. He claims that given the cost for England of the French and Indian War, and the benefits the colonies got from their mother-country, such as land, peace, and a forthcoming growing trade, them supporting their military forces is the least they can do.
Explanation:
2. His arguments are biased, as he was a British treasurer, meaning that his best interest was for the Sugar Act to be enacted. Furthermore, he didn´t seem to take under consideration that American colonists favored dealing with foreign planters.
3. The Sugar Act is a form of taxation without representation, which is not fair. Furthermore, it´s an economic threat to the development of the colonies, and therefore, a reason to envision an armed conflict.
Helloooo no answer choices??
