1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
3 years ago
6

Which lines from Natalie Merchant's song "Wonder" most likely inspired R. J. Palacio to give August's mother's great determinati

on in the novel Wonder?
Doctors have come from distant cities
just to see me
stand over my bed
disbelieving what they're seeing
with love, with patience and with faith
she'll make her way
I'm over your heads
how I confound you and astound you
English
2 answers:
Ivenika [448]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:d

Explanation:

Tom [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D. I'm over your heads,  

how I confound you and astound you.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What linguistic devices does lago use to convince Othello? Identify two specific devices or examples ? help it’s a quiz and i ha
Lorico [155]

Answer: JAHSDBJSMSSNDND

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Need help on this please
kogti [31]
Hi, the answer should be letter B.
3 0
3 years ago
Main characters in cherry tree by ruskin bond​
KiRa [710]

Answer:

Explanation:

Rakesh followed up on his best therapeutic understanding and confined his patient's eating routine - just this time his patient is his father. One of Desai's objectives is to address where moral limits lie in connection to applying Western logical standards to customary social circumstances: Ought to Rakesh have treated his father, surprisingly, similar to a patient? Would Rakesh have been abusing restorative morals on the off chance that he didn't have any significant bearing exacting standards to his father similarly he did to his different patients?  

Two things occured because of Rakesh's limitations on his father's eating regimen. In any event one of these things likewise caused the change that overwhelmed Rakesh's character. One thing is that his rural community raised spouse selfishly and ungenerously enjoyed denying and depriving her father in-law of things he needed. The other is that the father bribed Rakesh's kids to get him the things he needed that Rakesh kept him from having. At the point when Rakesh found the deceit and the misleading, he was maddened, as any parent may be. He not just chided his father in the harshest terms- - something he had never done - he developed the confinements on and expanded the supervision of his eating routine.  

The inquiry is raised regarding whether Rakesh's displeasure was supported; regardless of whether it had consistently been a piece of his character however not demonstrated in light of the fact that his father had never prompted it; was on the grounds that he esteemed his father a substandard and ruining impact. The story closes with a greater number of inquiries than it began with. Truth be told, there is an inquiry raised about the way of life that energizes such carefully characterized and communicated jobs that can be so ruinous when turned around or meddled with.

4 0
3 years ago
Coworkers would describe me as someone who follow the rules
expeople1 [14]
What exactly is the question
3 0
3 years ago
In night, Moishe the Beadle is a deeply devout student of Jewish mysticism, but after seeing what the Nazis have done “He no lon
natita [175]

Answer:

Explanation:

First of all a Beadle is a minor official in a synagogue hyrarchary. He may also be a church official in Christian Churches.

Second, you really have to know what Kabbalah is. Kabbalah is the mystic part of Jewish theology. It is not in the Bible as we understand what is supposed to be in the Bible. Anyone who studies Kabbalah is considered very devout. Few Women read Kabbalah, but like everything else, there are exceptions.

Third, not offered as a choice but I think you should know it anyway, the guards would have no idea what Moishe was saying or the incantations he repeated. But the Officers were likely educated enough that they knew what was happening.  

Moishe was clever enough that he knew he was making a spectacle of himself. He knew that he had better stop drawing attention attention to himself.

So he, like all the other Jews, only spoke of things that was around him. I could have started just by giving you the answer, but this question is far to important just to do that.

How dare the person giving the question offer you C. It is an outrage. We are talking about survival, not learning during peaceful times. Not C

Moishe might have begun thinking about A. He changed. I don't think A is the answer.

B is true, but not from this passage.

So D is the only answer (poor as it is).

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In "After Twenty Years," why doesn't Jimmy arrest Bob himself? Question 2 options: He can't bring himself to arrest his old frie
    8·2 answers
  • Who is Mr. Whymper in animal farm: postman, new farmer, banker, broker
    7·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE CORRECT ANSWER! PLEASE HELP!
    11·2 answers
  • Which sentence is the best example of an objective summary? A. The Constitution is not lengthy and every citizen ought to read i
    7·2 answers
  • Which fragment is made up of a complete subject?
    15·1 answer
  • A burning candle involves which energy transformation?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the main conflict in The book The Graphic Adaptation?
    8·1 answer
  • In an advertisement, a well-known doctor tells you should to try a product because it really works. what logical fallacy does th
    15·2 answers
  • Who was sent to angle island and Under what circumstances
    6·1 answer
  • 8
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!